Halo LID's Projects

More than 5,000 property owners within a half-mile of four study areas have recently received letters, surveys and invitations to open houses to explore Halo Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) in their neighborhood.

Last September, Southwest Neighborhoods, Inc. (SWNI) Transportation Committee recommended that Portland Department of Transportation (PDOT) and local neighborhood teams study four street segments for pedestrian and bicycle improvements. Neighborhood representatives assembled a project team for each pilot project. The task of the teams is to identify improvement alternatives and to evaluate project costs versus project benefits.

The neighborhood teams had a kick-off meeting last November and began working with the help of the engineering firm OTAK.

Neighbors living within a half-mile of the project streets received surveys and cover letters publicizing four public open houses, one for each of the street segments.

Agendas for the open houses generally followed this pattern:

  1. Presentation by the neighborhood team on their role and by OTAK on the preferred alternative they have identified.
  2. OTAK’s estimate of costs.
  3. Information from PDOT on ways to pay the costs. Commissioner Adams’ initial idea was to pay for the improvements with assessments on properties in broad oval areas circling the street segments (halo local improvement districts). But subsidies may be found to cover some of the costs.
  4. Questions and comments from the public.

Background
Residents of southwest Portland have been concerned for many years about the lack of pedestrian and bicycle facilities in their part of the city. Urban streets should include facilities for motor vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians in order to best serve the public. However, it has not been possible in the past to construct all of the needed improvements with public funding.

City Commissioner Adams met with the SWNI Transportation Committee in July 2006 and recommended that residents address the problem locally, using alternative designs acceptable under the city’s Pedestrian Design Guide.

Commissioner Adams suggested using the “Halo” Local Improvement Districts (LIDs) to fund our needed improvements. Under a conventional LID, most or all of the participation in an LID is by property owners abutting a proposed local improvement. A Halo LID is based on the principle that many more properties enjoy the benefits of improvements on major streets beyond just the abutting properties. This would include properties a distance away but in close enough proximity to use the improvements. With a larger number of benefiting properties, the project costs are shared with many benefiting properties, which make the individual shares more affordable.

SWNI took the challenge. SWNI’s transportation committee reviewed 10 candidate projects with the help of PDOT and its contractor, OTAK, where pedestrian and bicycle improvements are needed. Four pilot projects were selected for study.

If a local improvement district project were to be initiated by the neighborhood and approved by the city council, property owners abutting the proposed project streets and located within walking distance from the project streets would be obligated to contribute the major share of the money needed for engineering and construction. We will be providing information at the open houses on how local improvement districts are formed, options for equitably sharing costs, and financing options.

We are seeking comment and participation from residents. Affected residents have been mailed an opinion survey for them to express their thoughts on the proposed projects, and we have invited neighbors to attend an open house neighborhood meeting on these projects.

If you have questions or would like to learn more, please contact Leonard Gard, the SWNI program manager, at 503-823-4592, or leonard@swni.org. Also, the Portland Office of Transportation (PDOT) Pedestrian Design Guide has numerous illustrations and photographs of pedestrian facility designs that meet city and federal standards. You can view these at the PDOT website. pedestrian designs. (PDF)
We want to make clear that no local improvement district have been formed yet, and no one is being asked to contribute any amount of money as part of this study. We are simply looking at conceptual designs and potential project cost information and want input as early as possible.

Thoughts and opinions from residents will help the project teams as they work through the complex design and funding issues. If you have received a survey; we want to know what you think. Mail, fax, or hand-deliver your survey to the SWNI office in the Multnomah Center (room 4) at the intersection of SW 31st Avenue and Capitol Highway. The mailing address is SWNI, 7688 SW Capitol Hwy, Portland, OR 97219. The fax number is 503-823-3161.

View power point presentations:
Hamilton From 39th to 60th
35th From Stephenson to Arnold
Vermont from 30th to 37th
Vermont from 45th to 66th

View power point presentations as a PDF:
Hamilton From 39th to 60th
35th From Stephenson to Arnold
Vermont from 30th to 37th
Vermont from 45th to 66th

1/2 mile walkshed around street improvement:(PDF's)
Hamilton from 39th to 60th
35th from Stephenson to Arnold
Vermont street from 30th to 37th
Vermont street 45th to 66th

Revised Map:(PDF)
These maps show the areas of those interested in the project (in green) and those not interested (in red).
View all 4 maps

Thanks to Hamilton Core Team!

Thank you! to the Hamilton core team for your energy and hard work in putting this together and presenting it tonight at the meeting!Personally, I believe that Hamilton is not safe for pedestrians, and that safety would be improved by adding sidewalks. Your proposal is an excellent start.If this proposal becomes a LID, please consider a sidewalk on only one side of Hamilton to reduce costs and limit the complication and risk.

Reject the LID

I strongly urge the associations to reject the LID for the following reasons:
There are more important priorities that need attention. Regardless of whoever gets elected president, Bush tax reforms expire in 2010 and everyone will see their federal taxes increase.  That's a given. Locally, we are talking about a $4 billion dollar bridge over the Columbia. There is $2 billion in defered school maintenance that is unfunded and will need to be. There is $2 billion in road maintenance that is unfunded and will need to be.  Our already burdensome tax structure is going to increase significantly very soon.  The LID will add even more to it.  While this project might be a "nice to have," we have more important "must haves" that must take priority.
The presentation last week stated that our piece (45th to 66th) of the project will cost $3.5 million and will be paid for by approximately 1650 households. However, we will also pay for any cost over-runs, changes in the plan, improvements added after project approval and so on. We assume all the risk. What was proposed as an average of approximately $2200 for each household could run significantly more by completion. We have seen it with a $15 million tram costing over three times its estimate, at $55 million.  We have seen a $30 million water billing system mothballed. We are currently experiencing a failed sewer line on Multnomah Blvd, due to city design changes that caused leaks to occur, requiring replacement and a waste of $7-8 million.  Even the engineering firm pointed to several factors that will significantly impact the final cost. It is too risky to move ahead with these projects when such a small group is responsible for the cost over-runs.
With all this money floating around in other city budgets that is wasted, why can't they shift some priorities and pay for this project with general tax funds?  We are told there are other priorities and the system doesn't work that way. 
OK, but when we accept the poor performance of the projects listed above, we need to realize the REAL cost is that there is no money to do projects like this one. The answer is not for us to pay for it again with additional taxes....it is for us to demand better than sub-standard performance from our elected officials and the jurisdictions they operate.  We nearly could build 2 of the 3 projects with the money they will respend to fix the failed sewer line on Multnomah Blvd...money that is now down the drain. 
The city is asking the LID households to assume all the financial responsibility with no commitments from them.  They have dangled "carrots" out there with "possible" monies from the water bureau and the Green Streets program, but say these bureaus won't commit dollars without seeing us put up money first. This is bad policy...they are spending our money already. 
They should be required to commit their portion of the project for already planned water line replacement and the portion of the $6 million Green Streets so we know what we need to add to make it happen.  They work for us, not the other way around. They have it backwards.
It does not make sense for the 45th to Olson Road piece to be built unless the other piece connecting 45th & Vermont to 30th is built.  They go together.  The cost of that piece is estimated at another $3 + million.  Again, these are very preliminary estimates and can easily increase exponentially due to the many factors stated above, and greater expense to the families in that LID.  At the meeting, I believe they said survey results showed over 100 of the 160 respondents on that piece were against it.
We should be AGAINST our portion of the LID project too for the following reasons...and more. 
  • The timing is not right....higher taxes are coming. 
  • We have more pressing priorities, like road repairs, school repairs. 
  • The cost of the project has so many hidden factors that what has been presented as possible costs will likely grow exponentially by project completion.  It happens nearly every time. 
  • Failure to perform -- which has happened often -- or exponentially escallating costs can not be spread out over the entire city....it will be the burden of just 1650 households on modest incomes.  
  • The project needs to connect Vermont from Olsen Road to SW 30th or nothing at all.
  • This is too great a risk to take on our own without city commitments or a requirement of a fixed bid to the contractors. 
The LID is not the right solution. I think if the question were asked in this way:  Are you in favor of building sidewalks and bike paths in your area if you have to pay for them with your money instead of with city tax dollars?  ...you would get a much more realistic and much more unfavorable response from the 5000 affected families.

Multnomah Sewer Line

About the sewer line you mention, it turns out that the project wasn’t necessary in the first place, and isn’t essential to repair now. It was intended as a “cost savings” project. The city could (and perhaps should) walk away from it at any time. Don’t expect that to happen, though! More about it here, including a link to a Portland Tribune article.

Regarding the school project, let’s hope they build domes. These structures cost less to build, are naturally earthquake resilient, and cost significantly less to heat, cool and maintain.

Vermont improvements

As a resident who lives on Vermont and whose property would be directly affected, these improvements should be considered as safety improvements for the neighborhood.  Currently, there is no safe way of walking to Gabriel Park or the SW Community Center from neighborhoods along Vermont St west of SW 45th.  This road is used daily by runners, walkers, bus users, and kids walking to/from school who must navigate unimproved narrow areas.  My young family has attempted to the walk up to the park only once and had cross over Vermont several times with cars zooming by at 45mph.  Its a shame that we must drive only 10 blocks in order to get there safely.  As a engineer, I question the construction cost estimate.  Over half of the construction cost of this project is for installing a 4' tall retaining wall along the sidewalk.  I drive along this section every day and estimate that 75% of the sidewalk should not need a 4' retaining wall.  This would lower the construction cost to about $199 per lineal foot for a new construction cost estimateof $1,268,000.  If the engineering design cost is based on 40% of the construction cost, it too should be reduced from $859,000 to $507,000.  This estimate still seems large due to the nature of this project, engineering drawings for a new sidewalk should be considerably less, including storm water desing.  This would bring the new project total down to $2,255,000.  I think the City should pick up some of this cost as it will be addressing a neighborhood safety issue.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.